Overview of some of the top-value 2nd pairing puck-moving defensemen

We analyzed some of the best value top pairing defensemen here. While getting top production at strong market value is paramount, finding good value throughout the lineup is also important. Today we take a quick look at some of the better value contracts of 2nd pairing defensemen.

A couple things to note:

+ We rank “pairing” based on the quality of competition (which accounts for ice time) that each defenseman faces. Given normal error in the model, some “top pairing” guys will trickle into 2nd pairing and vice-versa

+ There are other factors that go into the value of a player (e.g., special teams ability, defensive scoring chance suppression, etc.), but we use QoC adjusted puck movement ability (because of the important of puck movement from the back-end in today’s NHL – we go into detail here)

Overview of key terms

Our puck movement metric considers relative corsi improvement, weighted by teammate strength (both defense partner and forward lines – isolated), zone starts, usage, and even chemistry. We look at it in more detail here.

+ Our QoC (quality of competition) was built based on 4 variables: opponent corsi for %, gf/60, FirstA/60, and TOI/gp. We discuss that in detail here.

+ QoC adj. PMF is simply the puck moving ability metric adjusted for quality of competition that the player faced. We touched on that here.

+ Finally, $ per is just the cap hit per QoC adjusted PMF score

28jul2017 --value 2nd pair.JPG

Some rapid fire observations:

+ Damon Severson (PMF +2.51) and Josh Manson (PMF +4.45) both excelled as puck movers against 2nd line competition. Severson was on a rookie contract which explains the extremely low $ per QoC adjusted PMF and is currently an RFA.  Projecting his next salary using this model has Severson signing at $4.8M per season (market value for 2nd pairing puck mover of his performance). Manson, too, will expect a raise if he can continue to build off his big 2016/17 (he’s a free agent after 17/18). If he maintains his performance level, expect him to sign in the $4M – $5M range, too.

+ Mark Pysyk (PMF +1.30) was a bargain for the Panthers last season at his cap hit of $1.1M. He just re-signed a 3-year deal that carries a $2.7M cap hit. That was great value for Florida: even at $2.7M, Pysyk’s $ per QoC adj. PMF is $45K, well below 2nd pairing average.

+ Jordie Benn (PMF -0.47), who Montreal acquired this past season, is also strong value. He faced lower-end 2nd line competition (between Montreal and Dallas) and performed just OK. You can see his QoC adjusted puck movement ability is well below Ekholm for example. No one is making the case that Benn is a more efficient puck mover than Ekholm. But at $1.1M, this is excellent value – and a coup for Marc Bergevin and the Canadiens.

+ Ekholm (+1.30), Hamhuis (+1.86), and Muzzin (+0.66) are 3 examples of players in the higher cap hit range ($3.8M – $4.0M) – but who were extremely effective at moving the puck and driving possession.

Verdict

No team in any sport will be perfectly optimized across the board in terms of contract value. But finding 2nd and 3rd pairing gems – at great contracts – will often make a big difference.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s